Subsection 7.1 Basic Mathematics
\begin{equation*}
\frac{1}{\Bigl(\sqrt{\phi \sqrt{5}}-\phi\Bigr) e^{\frac25 \pi}} = 1+\frac{e^{-2\pi}} {1+\frac{e^{-4\pi}} {1+\frac{e^{-6\pi}} {1+\frac{e^{-8\pi}} {1+\ldots} } } }
\end{equation*}
And again, from the MathJax demonstration page, Maxwell’s equations:
\begin{align*}
\nabla \times \vec{\mathbf{B}} -\, \frac1c\, \frac{\partial\vec{\mathbf{E}}}{\partial t} & = \frac{4\pi}{c}\vec{\mathbf{j}}\\
\nabla \cdot \vec{\mathbf{E}} & = 4 \pi \rho\\
\nabla \times \vec{\mathbf{E}}\, +\, \frac1c\, \frac{\partial\vec{\mathbf{B}}}{\partial t} & = \vec{\mathbf{0}}\\
\nabla \cdot \vec{\mathbf{B}} & = 0
\end{align*}
Historically, we provided internal support for the LaTeX package extpfeil. As of 2023-10-19 this has become an author election (see the <docinfo> section in the source of this document). We preeserve a small test that this extensible arrows library is being included properly:
\begin{equation*}
A\xmapsto[\text{bijection}]{\Phi+\Psi+\Theta}B
\end{equation*}
Look back at the top of the source file of this document to see how to include your TeX macros just once. For best results keep your macros simple and semantic.
PreTeXt once provided modest built-in support for “slanted”, or “beveled”, or “nice” fractions. To wit, we mean fractions such as:
\(\sfrac{3}{8}\text{.}\) Use the pre-defined
\sfrac{}{} macro in your mathematics to achieve this presentation. The presentation in HTML is subpar, but could improve as MathJax provides support. It is now an author’s responsibility to add support for superior typesetting for
PDF output by loading the
xfrac LaTeX package with the following in
<docinfo>:
<math-package latex-name="xfrac" mathjax-name=""/>
which is what we have done here as a test. See the Guide for more details.
We consider a system of equations. We number the first and last equation (there are just two) and include an xml:id on each. We reference the whole system later as the range of equations from the first to the last.
\begin{align}
\frac{dx}{dt} \amp = x^2 - 4x - y + 4\tag{7.1}\\
\frac{dy}{dt} \amp = x^3 - y\text{.}\tag{7.2}
\end{align}
Subsection 7.2 Displayed Mathematics
Multi-line displays of mathematics are achieved with the md tag ( “math display”), and the variant that produces numbers on each line, mdn ( “math display numbered”), used within a paragraph (p). As a good example of how XML syntax is superior, you author \(n\) lines of equations by enclosing each line inside of a mrow tag, rather than using \(n-1\) separators (such as \\).
If you use no ampersands to express alignment (read ahead), then each equation is centered independently on the width of the text. This is implemented according to the AMSmath LaTeX package’s gather environment. Example:
\begin{gather*}
\frac{dx}{dt} = x^2 - 4x - y + 4\\
\frac{dy}{dt} = x^3 - y\text{.}
\end{gather*}
An ampersand is used, in two ways, to describe positioning several equations per line, organized in columns. We have created the pre-defined LaTeX macro \amp as one way specify these, but the escape sequence & may be used also. The second, fourth, sixth, … ampersands separate columns, and the spacing between columns will be provided automatically. The first, third, fifth, … ampersands are alignment points for the equations in each column. Typically this is placed just prior to a binary operator, such as an equal sign (\amp = ), or for a column of explanations or commentary, just prior to the \text{} macro. Note that this scenario suggests always having an odd number of ampersands in each mrow. In the example below, alignment is on the equals sign in the first two columns, and provides left-justification to the explanations in the third column. N.B.: the use below of the \text{} macro does not include mathematics within its argument. Doing so may yield unpredictable results depending on your choice of delimiters for the mathematics (and using an m tag will be ineffective).
\begin{align*}
\frac{dx}{dt} \amp = x^2 - 4x - y + 4 \amp \frac{dy}{dt} \amp = x^3 - y \amp\amp x, y\text{ version}\\
\frac{dw}{dt} \amp = z^3 - w \amp \frac{dz}{dt} \amp = z^2 - 4z - w + 4 \amp\amp z, w\text{ version}
\end{align*}
PreTeXt will automatically detect the presence or absence of ampersands, but by defining macros for entire aligned equations, you can effectively hide the ampersands. So the @alignment attribute can override automatic detection. We use a simple LaTeX macro to demonstrate setting alignment='align' to override the use of a gather environment and use a align environment instead. Example:
\begin{align*}
\myequation{\frac{dx}{dt}}{x^2 - 4x - y + 4}\\
\myequation{\frac{dy}{dt}}{x^3 - y}\text{.}
\end{align*}
The AMSmath LaTeX package’s alignat environment is a third variant of alignment. It never happens automatically, you need to ask for it with alignment="alignat". It is very similar to align but adds no space between the equation columns. So you can leave it that way, or you can add your own “extra” space to suit. Here is a previous example with no inter-column space:
\begin{alignat*}{3}
\frac{dx}{dt} \amp = x^2 - 4x - y + 4 \amp \frac{dy}{dt} \amp = x^3 - y \amp\amp x, y\text{ version}\\
\frac{dw}{dt} \amp = z^3 - w \amp \frac{dz}{dt} \amp = z^2 - 4z - w + 4 \amp\amp z, w\text{ version}\text{.}
\end{alignat*}
This modified example has a middle row with three columns, while the other rows have just one column, as a test of our routines for determining the mrow with the greatest number of ampersands (and how many there are),
\begin{alignat*}{3}
\frac{dw}{dt} &= z^3 - w\\
\frac{dx}{dt} &= x^2 - 4x - y + 4 & \frac{dy}{dt} &= x^3 - y&& x, y\text{ third column}\\
\frac{dw}{dt} & = z^3 - w\text{.}
\end{alignat*}
Final example demonstrates that ampersands in other objects (matrices here) can wreak havoc with computing the number of columns. So we provide yet another attribute to override automatic detection, alignat-columns. This is the number of columns not the number of ampersands. Generally, for \(c\) columns, there will be \(2c-1\) ampersands.
\begin{alignat*}{2}
A &= \begin{bmatrix}1 & 2 \\ 3 & 4\end{bmatrix} & I &= \begin{bmatrix}1 & 0 \\ 0 & 1\end{bmatrix}\text{.}
\end{alignat*}
One caveat: if your number of ampersands is even (see advice above about using an odd number) behavior should still be correct, as in next example.
If you want super-precise control over alignment of the terms of a system of equations (linear or not) you can use the alignat option to advantage by not including any extra space. This example is modified slightly from a post by Alex Jordan:
\begin{alignat*}{4}
2x \amp {}+{} \amp y \amp {}+{} \amp 3z \amp {}={} \amp 10\\
x \amp \amp \amp {}+{} \amp z \amp {}={} \amp 6\\
x \amp {}+{} \amp 3y \amp {}+{} \amp 2z \amp {}={} \amp 13\text{.}
\end{alignat*}
Beautiful.
A long equation, to check layout on various screen sizes. This is Weil’s “explicit formula” for the Riemann \(\zeta\)-function:
\begin{equation}
\sum_\gamma S_-(\gamma) = \frac{\log Q}{\pi} \hat S_-(0) + \frac{1}{2\pi} \sum_{j=1}^d \Re\left\{ \int_{-\infty}^\infty \frac{\Gamma'}{\Gamma}\left(\frac{1}{4} + \frac{it}{2} + \mu_j\right)S_-(t) dt\right\} - \frac{d}{2\pi}\hat S_-(0)\log \pi\text{.}\tag{7.3}
\end{equation}
Example 7.1. Excessive Display Mathematics.
In print versions, a long run of displayed equations often needs to be broken across pages. If you are reading some other version of this, then there is nothing to see here. But for LaTeX output it could be interesting. First, with no extra effort, this page-long display should break naturally, no matter how the preceding material changes.
\begin{gather*}
x^2+y^2=z^2\\
a^2+b^2=c^2\\
\alpha^2+\beta^2=\gamma^2\\
m^2+n^2=p^2\\
x^2+y^2=z^2\\
a^2+b^2=c^2\\
\alpha^2+\beta^2=\gamma^2\\
m^2+n^2=p^2\\
x^2+y^2=z^2\\
a^2+b^2=c^2\\
\alpha^2+\beta^2=\gamma^2\\
m^2+n^2=p^2\\
x^2+y^2=z^2\\
a^2+b^2=c^2\\
\alpha^2+\beta^2=\gamma^2\\
m^2+n^2=p^2\\
x^2+y^2=z^2\\
a^2+b^2=c^2\\
\alpha^2+\beta^2=\gamma^2\\
m^2+n^2=p^2\\
x^2+y^2=z^2\\
a^2+b^2=c^2\\
\alpha^2+\beta^2=\gamma^2\\
m^2+n^2=p^2\\
x^2+y^2=z^2\\
a^2+b^2=c^2\\
\alpha^2+\beta^2=\gamma^2\\
m^2+n^2=p^2\\
x^2+y^2=z^2\\
a^2+b^2=c^2\\
\alpha^2+\beta^2=\gamma^2\\
m^2+n^2=p^2\\
x^2+y^2=z^2\\
a^2+b^2=c^2\\
\alpha^2+\beta^2=\gamma^2\\
m^2+n^2=p^2\\
x^2+y^2=z^2\\
a^2+b^2=c^2\\
\alpha^2+\beta^2=\gamma^2\\
m^2+n^2=p^2\\
x^2+y^2=z^2\\
a^2+b^2=c^2\\
\alpha^2+\beta^2=\gamma^2\\
m^2+n^2=p^2\\
x^2+y^2=z^2\\
a^2+b^2=c^2\\
\alpha^2+\beta^2=\gamma^2\\
m^2+n^2=p^2\text{.}
\end{gather*}
In this version we have turned off page breaking for the entire display, but then allowed a break at every fourth equation, so you should see a reasonably attractive page break right after one of the \(m^2+n^2=p^2\) equations.
\begin{gather}
x^2+y^2=z^2\tag{7.4}\\
a^2+b^2=c^2\tag{7.5}\\
\alpha^2+\beta^2=\gamma^2\tag{7.6}\\
m^2+n^2=p^2\tag{7.7}\\
x^2+y^2=z^2\tag{7.8}\\
a^2+b^2=c^2\tag{7.9}\\
\alpha^2+\beta^2=\gamma^2\tag{7.10}\\
m^2+n^2=p^2\tag{7.11}\\
x^2+y^2=z^2\tag{7.12}\\
a^2+b^2=c^2\tag{7.13}\\
\alpha^2+\beta^2=\gamma^2\tag{7.14}\\
m^2+n^2=p^2\tag{7.15}\\
x^2+y^2=z^2\tag{7.16}\\
a^2+b^2=c^2\tag{7.17}\\
\alpha^2+\beta^2=\gamma^2\tag{7.18}\\
m^2+n^2=p^2\tag{7.19}\\
x^2+y^2=z^2\tag{7.20}\\
a^2+b^2=c^2\tag{7.21}\\
\alpha^2+\beta^2=\gamma^2\tag{7.22}\\
m^2+n^2=p^2\tag{7.23}\\
x^2+y^2=z^2\tag{7.24}\\
a^2+b^2=c^2\tag{7.25}\\
\alpha^2+\beta^2=\gamma^2\tag{7.26}\\
m^2+n^2=p^2\tag{7.27}\\
x^2+y^2=z^2\tag{7.28}\\
a^2+b^2=c^2\tag{7.29}\\
\alpha^2+\beta^2=\gamma^2\tag{7.30}\\
m^2+n^2=p^2\tag{7.31}\\
x^2+y^2=z^2\tag{7.32}\\
a^2+b^2=c^2\tag{7.33}\\
\alpha^2+\beta^2=\gamma^2\tag{7.34}\\
m^2+n^2=p^2\tag{7.35}\\
x^2+y^2=z^2\tag{7.36}\\
a^2+b^2=c^2\tag{7.37}\\
\alpha^2+\beta^2=\gamma^2\tag{7.38}\\
m^2+n^2=p^2\tag{7.39}\\
x^2+y^2=z^2\tag{7.40}\\
a^2+b^2=c^2\tag{7.41}\\
\alpha^2+\beta^2=\gamma^2\tag{7.42}\\
m^2+n^2=p^2\tag{7.43}\\
x^2+y^2=z^2\tag{7.44}\\
a^2+b^2=c^2\tag{7.45}\\
\alpha^2+\beta^2=\gamma^2\tag{7.46}\\
m^2+n^2=p^2\tag{7.47}\\
x^2+y^2=z^2\tag{7.48}\\
a^2+b^2=c^2\tag{7.49}\\
\alpha^2+\beta^2=\gamma^2\tag{7.50}\\
m^2+n^2=p^2\text{.}\tag{7.51}
\end{gather}
So. Do not take any extra steps and let LaTeX figure out the breaks. If you do not like a break, modify the md or mdn to go back to the AMSmath default behavior and not break at all. Ever. Or rather, go further and modify an individual mrow to suggest that it is a good place for a break.
This is a poorly-authored paragaph to test the conversion to
HTML. There are two displayed equations, separated by a period ending the first one’s sentence, which should migrate into the display, and not leave behind an empty paragraph:
\begin{equation*}
z+y = z\text{.}
\end{equation*}
\begin{equation*}
a + b = c\text{.}
\end{equation*}
This final sentence should remain, inside another
HTML paragraph, without the second equation’s period.
Subsection 7.4 Advanced Mathematics
MathJax is extremely capable in rendering a subset of LaTeX in web browsers, and improving all the time. You can get fairly fancy with some of its supported commands. In particular, if you need to mix in a few words with your mathematics, the \text{} macro is supported. For example, you might use an “if” or an “otherwise” in the definition of a piecewise function.
Consider that the first line below is text sandwiched in-between two Greek letters, wrapped in a \text{} macro. In HTML output we have taken care that the font for text material within display mathematics should match the font of the surrounding paragraph, as also happens with LaTeX output. The second line is nearly identical in the source, but is just naked text being rendered like a slew of variables.
\begin{gather*}
\alpha\text{ is not equal to }\beta\\
\alpha is not equal to \beta\\
\alpha\neq\beta\text{.}
\end{gather*}
We are not suggesting here that using words in place of symbols, as in the first line, is a good practice. (It is not.)
The following example is a good stress-test of using the \text{} macro to achieve certain effects. Note the Unicode left and right smart quotes. This a contribution from Alex Jordan as part of his work on APEX Calculus.
\begin{gather*}
y \rightarrow \frac{\sin(0) }{0} \rightarrow {{\text{“}}\atop{}}\frac{0}{0}{{\text{”}}\atop{}}\text{.}
\end{gather*}
And another one from Alex. Note the use of the
\mathord{} and
\mathrel{} macros to control spacing around the mathematical symbols. Examine the source to see how the quotation marks have been authored with
XML syntax for Unicode characters, since we do not allow most markup inside mathematics.
\begin{gather*}
\zeta(1)=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{1}{n}\mathrel{\text{ “}\mathord{=}{\text{” }}}\prod_{p}\left(\frac{1}{1-1/p}\right)=\prod_{p}\left(\frac{1}{1-p^{-1}}\right)
\end{gather*}
Generally, you cannot use any
XML elements inside of the mathematics elements. An exception is the
xref element which you might want to use to provide justifications for the steps of a derivation. Here is a visual example that is mathematically meaningless,
\begin{align*}
A&=B+C&&\knowl{./knowl/xref/corollary-FTC-derivative.html}{\text{Corollary 4.1}}\\
&=D+E&&\knowl{./knowl/xref/theorem-FTC.html}{\text{The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus}}\\
&=F+G&&\knowl{./knowl/xref/theorem-number-01.html}{\text{A nice result}}\text{.}
\end{align*}
Scott Beaver likes to write short chains of equalities all in one line, with the cross-references sitting on each equals sign. Here we test the
LaTeX \overset and
\underset macros wrapping a PreTeXt
<xref>, with and without content, inside an
<me> element. Note that
\stackrel is obsolete, and
\overunderset is not yet supported by MathJax (but see
GitHub #2704). The mathematics is Scott’s, the reasons are totally unrelated to the math.
\begin{equation*}
AC-AD \overset{\knowl{./knowl/xref/theorem-FTC.html}{2.1}}{=} A(C-D) \underset{\knowl{./knowl/xref/definition-indefinite-integral.html}{2.2}}{=} A0_{n\times p} \overset{\knowl{./knowl/xref/theorem-FTC.html}{Thm. 2.1}}{=} 0_{m\times p}
\end{equation*}
We suggest using cross-references that only display numbers (
<xref> with
@text set to
global) since if you stick to elements like
<theorem>,
<lemma>,
<definition>, or
<axiom>, then the numbers will be unambiguous and the target of the cross-reference will contain full information. But note that if you mix in divisions, or perhaps figures, as reasons then there is a possibility that numbers will need to be qualified by their type. We have provided an abbreviation for one cross-reference to
Theorem 2.1 (which will not benefit from automatic translation to other languages).
Subsection 7.5 Local Tags on Equations
If you are not writing a research monograph, maybe (a) you will not use many numbered equations, or do not like the looks of them, or feel they scare your readers, and (b) maybe your cross-references are always local-ish, like strictly within an example or a proof. For this situation you can create, and employ, a “local” tag on a displayed equation. Nothing enforces the idea of what constitutes local, and there is nothing to stop you from using the same symbols more than once. With freedom comes responsibility.
Use the @tag attribute on an mrow, only. (Remember, you can have just one mrow.) The behavior is identical within an md or mdn. The value of the @tag attribute is a symbol name. The prefix d means “double”, and the prefix t means “triple”. So allowed values are
star, dstar, tstar
dagger, ddagger, tdagger
daggerdbl, ddaggerdbl, tdaggerdbl
hash, dhash, thash
maltese, dmaltese, tmaltese
Cross-references to these tagged equations happens in the usual way and should behave as expected. We test the double versions to make sure the symbols render properly in various output formats.
\begin{align}
c^2 \amp = a^2+b^2\tag{✶✶}\\
c^2 \amp = a^2+b^2\tag{††}\\
c^2 \amp = a^2+b^2\tag{‡‡}\\
c^2 \amp = a^2+b^2\tag{##}\\
c^2 \amp = a^2+b^2\tag{✠✠}\\
z^2 \amp = x^2+y^2\tag{7.52}
\end{align}
Subsection 7.8 Fonts and Mathematics
This section is about testing types and sizes of fonts, not so much about using different typefaces. First, one long displayed equation, which is designed to be full-width for LaTeX output when using defaults as of 2020-01-29 (commit defd4bffd462e7ea).
Start paragraph.
\begin{equation*}
a^2 + b^2 + a^2 + b^2 + a^2 + b^2 + a^2 + b^2 + a^2 + b^2 + a^2 + b^2 + a^2 + b^2 + a^2 + b^2 + a^2 + b^2 + a^2 + b^2
\end{equation*}
End paragraph.
The next paragraph has five ways to write the sine of \(x\text{,}\) bracketed by plain text versions. This tests font size and the fonts employed. The raw source of this paragraph is (spread over two lines)
sin x | <m>\sin x</m> | <m>\text{sin}\ x</m> | <m>\mathrm{sin}\ x</m> |
<m>\text{sin}x</m> | <m>sin x</m> | sin x
The five ways, from good to bad,
The best way, using \sin. Note the distance to the \(x\text{.}\)
With a \text{} macro.
With a \mathrm{} macro. Not recommended for PreTeXt.
Without a space. Note that the previous two require explicit spacing.
No extra effort, so LaTeX renders as a product of four variables.
sin x | \(\sin x\) | \(\text{sin}\ x\) | \(\mathrm{sin}\ x\) | \(\text{sin}x\) | \(sin x\) | sin x
Finally a simple paragraph that places a text “x” next to a variable “x”.
wordxx\(x+x\)xxword
